Search for: "HATCH v. WYETH"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2007, 2:51 pm
Impax Effexor XR: Wyeth v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 8:38 pm
Effexor XR: Wyeth v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 10:05 pm
In Wyeth v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 8:59 pm
Barr Protonix: Altana/Wyeth v. [read post]
6 May 2007, 9:06 pm
Sandoz Effexor XR: Wyeth v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 9:59 pm
This time the issue is not that the parties, Wyeth (branded) and Teva (generic) have entered into a reverse payment settlement agreement in their ANDA litigation under the Hatch-Waxman Act. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 9:52 pm
Effexor XR: Wyeth v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 11:37 pm
One of the joys of blogging is receiving feedback from our readers.We had two reactions to Monday's "Thought Experiment On Conte v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
As we reported yesterday, the California Supreme Court denied the petitions for review in Wyeth v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 1:32 pm
Generic Drugs from Brien Roche LawFailure to warn claims involving generic drugs took a significant hit on June 23, 2011 with the decision of Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm
Wyeth LLC, 872 F. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 7:11 am
In Mensing v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:43 am
In Wyeth v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:44 pm
Wyeth v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 11:22 am
The big picture changed with Wyeth v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 10:13 am
App. 2008), and the now reargued Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:58 am
Wyeth, Inc., 588 F.3d 603 (8th Cir. [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:51 pm
Wyeth, Inc. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:16 pm
Wyeth, Inc.], abrogated the Hatch-Waxman Amendments by allowing state tort liability for failure to warn in direct contravention of the Act’s requirement that a generic drug’s labeling be the same as the FDA-approved labeling for the listed (or branded) drug. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 7:13 am
Medtronic, but did not find preemption in the context of prescription drugs on the facts of Wyeth v. [read post]
